Xbox 360 Halo 3 Vs. Halo Reach

soulglazed

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Messages
23
Karma
1
Which one do you prefer? I think Reach gets too much hate but I liked 3 a lot more overall. I think the online experience was a lot better, even though I liked most of the additions they added in Reach. Hopefully 4 topples over both though, it looks that way!

I still wish that they'd remake 2 or something. I heard they were planning on doing it like they did with the original but it ended up getting canned or was a rumor or something like that? I forget, but 2 just had amazing maps and never got stale, I miss it :(
 
I prefer Halo Reach over Halo 3. Reach had better visuals, better sound, better gameplay, better story, better everything. It was such an improvement over the previous Halo games. Halo 3 was magnificent and extremely epic. It was my favorite FPS shooter... until Halo Reach arrived.
 
Last edited:
If it wasnt for 343 Halo reach would still be as bad as it was when It started... Idk what Bungie was thinking when they made it. They basically made a completely different game with the Halo name and I did not like that at all. I played halo 3 religiously Lol and when reach came I just gave up beause of how the gameplay style was.
 
I almost think Reach was a beta test for whatever they do next... Halo 3 for me. I think it still stands as the best. Halo 2 was great, better maps than 3. Reach with its limited jump and armor lock was just hard to play. I think it got a little better with the anniversary maps and the title update but overall just a mess. DLC was done terribly and too many Forge maps in the main playlists was a major eye sore for me. Halo 3 is the last Halo without any Call Of Duty influence and just played "right".
 

Latest threads

Back
Top