Xbox One Steam Dev Days show plan for Valve-owned future, and Microsoft should be terrified

ragnafable11

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
862
Karma
1
I think Microsoft should work and perfect kinect if they don't they might be eaten alive by other companies with their new VR tech.

Steam's interface looks like a curved screen in virtual reality. There are no fancy effects, no rooms to explore in order to launch games.

The SteamVR beta makes it appear as if you're in a generic environment looking at Steam running in Big Picture mode. That's it.

It's also another data point that suggests 2014 could be a big year for virtual reality. Developers have put out games and demos that operate in virtual reality since the release of the Oculus Rift development kit, but there are few tools available to launch each game without taking off the headset and interacting with a standard screen. User interface, the place you spend your time between games, is an unsolved problem.

Steam is, as of this writing, the only mainstream distribution platform with any kind of support for virtual reality. The implementation may be basic, but that still puts it a few light years ahead of everyone else. Valve wants to own the future, not just participate in it, and the beta of SteamVR released before the beginning of Steam Dev Days shows just how aggressive the company has grown in that regard.

Designing the road so that others may walk

Steam Dev Days, taking place Jan. 15-16 in Seattle, isn't open to the press. There will be no interviews given, and it's unlikely that there will be video or archives of the content shown. It's an off-the-record event where AMD, Intel, Nvidia, Oculus, Unity and yes, Valve itself will give talks and create bridges between the distribution service, the hardware and software that will drive Steam Machines, and the people who make the games that we play on the platform.

There are two major themes at the show. The first, and arguably most important, goal for Valve is to convince developers to take Linux, and by extension SteamOS, seriously as a platform for their games.

There is a panel about the basics of porting your game to Linux. There is a panel about moving your game to OpenGL. Nvidia will talk about reducing driver overhead. AMD will discuss its optimization and debugging tools and how to use them in Linux. The goal is to get developers started on Linux porting and development, and of course that means more games for SteamOS.

This isn't a small thing.

The first run of Steam Machines may not offer many benefits to PC gamers outside of the joy of being an early adopter, but Valve is playing a long game. Developer support is crucial if Valve wants its vision of a Windows-less gaming future to come to pass. SteamOS is free, but the real power in the platform, at least for Valve, is control over how games are sold and played.

Hardware manufacturers are likely overjoyed at the idea of selling pre-built systems using a free, flexible and, in many ways, open operating system.

Microsoft has nothing to fear today, but the idea that Valve, AMD, Nvidia and Intel are getting together with developers to push for a future without Windows should scare the living hell out of them as they peer into the future. Valve and Microsoft both want to own your living room, but the Xbox One is often a clunky, awkward device that tries to force you into Microsoft's ecosystem while limiting your media options. There is plenty of room for disruption.

The fact that Valve is trying to move into that market with Steam Machines and SteamOS, and the list of corporate friends that are helping developers understand the platform and its possibilities, should keep Microsoft up at night. This isn't a revolution, not yet, but powerful people with a lot of money are passing out the tech equivalent of muskets in the dead of night to prepare to overthrow the king.

Reality is virtual

While Steam Dev Days features panels that discuss Early Access and in-game economies, the other trend that's impossible to miss is virtual reality. Valve's Michael Abrash, who writes one of the best blogs about the technical issues in virtual reality, will share what the technology could be in two years.

Palmer Luckey, the founder of Oculus VR, will discuss best practices when porting games to virtual reality. Owlchemy Labs will talk about what they learned through the process of creating Aaaaaculus!, which was one of the first, and in my opinion best, of the commercially available Oculus Rift games.

There will likely be demos of the Crystal Cove prototype hardware, and plenty of networking with some of the best minds working in modern virtual reality. The retail version of the Oculus Rift hardware will likely be released in 2014, and Valve is doing everything it can to get developers interested in the technology while incorporating VR into its engines and existing games. Half-Life 2 on the Oculus Rift is already one of the coolest experiences one can have in modern gaming.

Powerful people with a lot of money are passing out the tech equivalent of muskets in the dead of night to prepare to overthrow the king

It's possible that virtual reality won't take off this year, or next year, or ever. It's a risky technology that has never lived up to expectation in the market, and it requires a large investment in terms of hardware, computing power and physical space on the part of the player. This is Valve's game, though: It's laying the tracks for a train that may or may not come, and having Steam operable in virtual reality already shows their dedication to the platform and the content that virtual reality enthusiasts will buy and play on it.

This is the power of Steam Dev Days: If virtual reality goes nowhere, Valve has lost very little; the company's structure is famously flat, and employees are encouraged to experiment with what's possible in these spaces. There is low risk in these experiments or in focusing on the technology during events. On the other hand, Valve is uniquely situated to go all-in if virtual reality does take off in the next year or two.

Other companies may be discussing what VR could mean for the gaming and hardware industry, but Valve is already putting pieces into place and investing in the technology. Valve is ready to pounce on any whiff of consumer interest in virtual reality, and there are few companies that will be able to compete.

Get on board, or get out of the way

This morning I've used Steam in virtual reality in my home, using my own Oculus Rift development kit. I've talked to a few developers who are going to these events, and they seem excited by the possibilities being offered.

Valve has often gone to developers to ask what they want and explore how to offer it, but now Valve is coming to them to explain that it wants Linux support, and to suggest that they look into virtual reality. It's very likely that the influential developers at the show will be happy to oblige.

Don't underestimate Valve's will, or its ability to shape the future into its own image. Steam Dev Days may look like a friendly series of talks on a number of issues, but the reality is that it presents a very specific blueprint for the future, and it's a future that Valve will be happy to own.

http://www.polygon.com/2014/1/14/5307584/steam-dev-days-valve-owned-future-plan
 
haha microsoft doesn't have anything to worry about. As what's already been shown people tend to be tend to go super xenophobic when it comes to changing the battlefield. Doubt get me wrong I'm rather interested in the oculus rift / omni combinations but I'm pretty sure that we'll be part of the minority...again...all this talk about VR and all the article mentions is the oculus. I get that it's the "best" example but really all this is coming off as is propaganda. Linux is at a huge minority compared to windows and even apple (which it's interesting that the article doesn't so much as suggest that apple's even a thing.) and now the idea is that since steam os is on it that everyone'll just switch? I dunno how this'll turn out but look towards the dreamcast, just because it's a good idea doesn't mean people will like it
 
It's gonna be a long while before VR tech becomes enough of a standard to truly outshine Kinect.

It is much more interesting but I very rarely hear talk about VR.
 
VR is still in its infancy stage so there really isn't any reason for Microsoft to be afraid ... yet. It would take at least a few more years for VR to truly penetrate the gaming market what's more have a large install base. I'm guessing the price for it is going to be high and that alone can be a major deterrent to the conservative gamers.
 
Microsoft need not worry. VR is still getting its kinks and bugs worked out so in time, VR will have its awesomeness but till then, VR still won't hit it home just yet. Besides, the install base for it might be small when it launches softly sometime in the next few years.,
 
VR is still too early for its time. Microsoft is not going to be terrified. Probably in 5 years, that's where VR will really take off but in the meantime, it's not yet the time for VR to take down Microsoft. Still early.
 
Nah, Microsoft's not going to get intimidated by this. VR is way too early to consider. It's not yet become the norm. Besides that, I'm not eager for the VR yet. But once people start going for the VR as a normal, that's when Microsoft can worry.
 
I don't see how VR could challenge the Kinect, I see them occupying completely different parts of the gaming experience. I do think the Rift will be a big success on PC and then we will see Sony and Microsoft bring out their own versions. Similar to motion controls in the last gen but hopefully with a little more staying power.
 
I don't see how VR could challenge the Kinect, I see them occupying completely different parts of the gaming experience. I do think the Rift will be a big success on PC and then we will see Sony and Microsoft bring out their own versions. Similar to motion controls in the last gen but hopefully with a little more staying power.

Exactly. As I said, still too early. Besides, I'm not too eager for it yet. Maybe somewhere in 2022, when we're in the time of Sword Art Online, VR will become big. Until then, nope, not yet its time.
 
Exactly. As I said, still too early. Besides, I'm not too eager for it yet. Maybe somewhere in 2022, when we're in the time of Sword Art Online, VR will become big. Until then, nope, not yet its time.

I guess so. But yeah. I hope I can play it while I'm still alive.
 
I guess so. But yeah. I hope I can play it while I'm still alive.

I think you'll still be living and breathing when VR comes. But hey, who knows? Technology surprises me everyday. I may be wrong. Just gotta see the news everyday on the development.
 
At this point Microsoft is fine, though I do agree the Kinect while improved from version 1 still has a long way to go. I would say that VR tech is the future and something that a lot of people are looking forward to but it's still in the baby steps right now. I'm looking forward to the day when we get our hands on the first phase of VR tech but we're still a good 10 years away from any real home purchase.
 

Latest threads

Back
Top