Annabell
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2014
- Messages
- 134
- Karma
- 0
Steam will die if gaming dies. Or if computers die. Neither is likely.
Well well Mr Morbid, look who's arrived.
Steam will die if gaming dies. Or if computers die. Neither is likely.
I thought you said that Steam was dead for a second there, and I was about to inquire as to what world you live in.
Steam will die if gaming dies. Or if computers die. Neither is likely.
XD hahahahaha. Ah because of the word "ahead". Yeah, it's easy to suddenly think I said dead. Well, good you read it carefully. Seriously, if I did say DEAD, I might be in a different world already XD
Then again, the day Valve announces 'Screw it, no more Half Life 3 ever' there might be a sudden dip in their sales just on principle.
Then again, the day Valve announces 'Screw it, no more Half Life 3 ever' there might be a sudden dip in their sales just on principle.
Then again, the day Valve announces 'Screw it, no more Half Life 3 ever' there might be a sudden dip in their sales just on principle.
So here's a question. Would you rather Microsoft give up that policy but in exchange force the developer to purchase the Xbox One dev kit? Because that's what you get when you sign up and get accepted into the id@Xbox program. You get 2 free dev kits. That's not to mention by the way they get free dedicated servers and free Unity license. And all their asking in return for all that free stuff is that they launch their game on the Xbox One at the same time that they launch on other platforms.
So would you rather make the developer pay for all the things Microsoft is giving them for free just to not have the parity clause?
I don't think they'll give way for that. It's really obvious that they want to keep this policy going.
My question was more for the people on the forum who automatically snap to the "ERMAGERD, Microsoft's policy is the worst and everyone hates it." mentality without seeing what the trade-off is.
So if Microsoft dumped the policy, but then stopped making the dev kits and unity license and dedicated servers free, would people be happier even if it meant less Indie games because the devs can't afford to purchase the materials? Because if you think this is going to lead to a boon of new Indie games, I think people aren't thinking this through.
So here's a question. Would you rather Microsoft give up that policy but in exchange force the developer to purchase the Xbox One dev kit? Because that's what you get when you sign up and get accepted into the id@Xbox program. You get 2 free dev kits. That's not to mention by the way they get free dedicated servers and free Unity license. And all their asking in return for all that free stuff is that they launch their game on the Xbox One at the same time that they launch on other platforms.
So would you rather make the developer pay for all the things Microsoft is giving them for free just to not have the parity clause?
I don't want to see another half life man. I'd rather pick another game.
I think you are very much in the minority of the internet then. But what games from Valve would you prefer they worked on?
Hhah. True that. I would love to see a new Half Life game in action. I suppose one of the Vlave employees let it slip that it's being worked upon along with Left for Dead 3.