It is never a bad idea to plug it into a surge protector.
Learn why that belief is contradicted when a simple question is answered ... such as what does a protector do? Following reasons demonstrate that advertising and hearsay have created your erroneous assumption.
spark_777's outlets sparked because he did not have the other and different solution called a surge protector. Be concerned if receptacles spark. Because a plug-in protector, not protected by an earthed 'whole house' protector, might create a fire.
Pictures demonstrate the danger even in a protector that otherwise claims to be functional. But the system requires you to reconstruct these URLs.
Triple w dot zerosurge.com slash technical-info/truth-about-movs
All 6 MOVs removed from circuit board, but "Protection Working" LED (immediately above large yellow capacitor) remains lit.
Obviously nothing here recommends a Zerosurge product as a solution. This sentence included because some may jump to conclusions without grasping what is stated and what facts report.
Norma in "The Power Outage":
Today, the cable company came to replace a wire. Well the cable man pulled a wire and somehow yanked loose their "ground" wire. The granddaughter on the computer yelled and ran because sparks and smoke were coming from the power surge strip.
Where is protection? Why assume that protector will avert sparks from a receptacle when even the manufacturer does not claim that protection? Because advertising said it was a surge protector? Therefore is must protect from everything? That is wild speculation. Where are facts and numbers that justify the conclusion?
An adjacent protector can even make damage easier. One informed statement from Microsoft agrees with science and contradicts posted speculations. Microsoft recommends not using a plug-in protector. Over 100 years of proven science recommends earthing one 'whole house' protector. So that even plug-in protectors do not cause a house fire - that Norma almost witnessed.
No one has said why an adjacent protector provides any protection. Even manufacturer specifications do not make that protection claim.
kx250rider on 31 May 2012 describes in “what a protector really does”:
Adding to the bottom line on "surge protectors", I was a TV repairman for years, and I can't tell you how many people whined to me, "I can't understand why my TV blew when the power surge came... I had it plugged into a protector!".
He also describes an APC created fire. One can appreciate the problem even cited by the Consumer Product Safety Council (you must reconstruct it):
Triple w dot cpsc.gov slash /en/Recalls/2014 slash Schneider-Electric-Recalls-APC-Surge-Protectors
Name of product:
APC SurgeArrest surge protectors
Hazard:
The surge protectors can overheat, smoke and melt, posing a fire hazard.
Remedy:
Replace
Do you believe wild speculation? Or learn facts and numbers to do what Microsoft recommends? Many recommend a plug-in protector only because it was the first recommendation they heard. Any recommendation that does not also say why with numbers is best ignored as hearsay. Their belief denies what science, numbers, facts, experience, and Microsoft recommend.